The inspiration I guess one could say for this article draws from the series
Mark Foster did back at the end of March. He had a series on practical
enhancements for the AR-15 rifle. There is no question the AR platform is quickly
becoming one of the preferred sporting arms of hunters and shooters alike. I
suppose it is the natural progression of things. Riflemen abandoned their single
shots for lever guns eons ago and then after the end of WWI the levers were
traded in large number for bolt actions, after WWII semi autos became more
prevalent to present day where the AR is quickly dominating the sporting rifle
arena. The AR is now available in a dizzying array of configurations and calibers
ranging from standard to exotic to niche cartridges specifically designed for a
single platform and purpose. All of this springs from a rifle that was ahead of its
time when designed a little over 60 years ago in 1956. Like many things, given
enough time, nostalgia seems to get the better of us, and people seem to want
things the way they used to be. This and the rising popularity of Vietnam era
militaria I believe has given birth to what is sometimes called the retro AR. These
are AR’s built with period correct parts to resemble the early iterations of our
beloved black rifles.
Sometime ago I had the hankering to assemble some sort of military
firearm from a parts kit. Eventually I decided I would narrow my field of
numerous choices by building something my father or grandfather carried while
they were in the service. As I figured out what I was willing to spend and what I
felt was within my means as far as tools available to me the list shortened even
more. I narrowed my choices down to building either a semi auto M60 or M1919.
When I saw how scarce and expensive all of the M60 parts and pieces have
become I ruled it out. The 1919 would also have been an expensive choice
because I would have to buy a lot of the tooling required to assemble the
weapon. Shucks! I thought I was going to get to have something cool. Then as I
closed my web browsers depressed about my research my desktop background
breathed new life in my little project. My background is a photo of my dad on the
range with his M16A1, and thus my little odyssey began.
I thought this should be easy enough. I can remember years back M16 parts
kits were easy to find and reasonably priced. I figured just buy a kit and a lower
and slam her together. I was disappointed to find at the time I was looking parts
kits were no longer as readily available and not nearly as inexpensive or pristine
as I recall. I did more research and found I had a few options for either assembling
or purchasing a faithful representation of the rifle my dad qualified with and
carried, such as the Fulton Armory Legacy Rifle. It is meant to be a replica of the
early M16. I compared it to photos I have of my dad, and some of the differences
just did not add up. I recalled my dad talking about the early rifles that were used
in the early days of Vietnam and the differences between them and the A1 he
carried. I decided I would have to dig more in the minutia of the M16’s history to
determine how best to arrive at an accurate representation of my dad’s rifle. I
discovered a site called retroblackrifle.com. These guys live eat and breathe early
M16 rifle and carbine variants down to the details of the various different small
parts used throughout the different models of rifles and carbines. I also found two
companies that are an excellent source for quality reproduction parts Nodak Spud
and Top Notch Top Ends (TNTE Sales).
Researching my photos and comparing them to the information on retro
black rifle I determined my father carried the Colt model 603 M16A1 variant. I still
had yet to find an M16A1 parts kit available anywhere at the time. I debated
buying an upper and lower receiver from Nodak spud and sourcing all of my other
parts elsewhere. I quickly realized that would get quite expensive. Undaunted I
continued scouring parts and surplus sites comparing prices and options on how
exactly to replicate my dad’s service rifle. Somehow or another I found TNTE
sales. They specialize in AR uppers and Patrick at TNTE is obsessed with quality
and is a black rifle aficionado.
TNTE offers a completed M603 M16A1 upper. The upper uses the period
correct .625 inch 1:12 twist 41V50 chrome lined barrel. The receiver is Nodak
Spud, barrel is new production, (as well as bolt and charging handle if ordered
with the upper) the remaining parts are period correct USGI parts. Patrick insisted
they only use the best parts they can get. Judging by the upper they sent me I
would have to agree. Not only are the uppers painstakingly correct but the parts
look factory fresh. Everything is exactly as I remember my dad talking about them.
The tear drop forward assist, flat delta ring, sight adjustment wheel, and the A1
style birdcage. I have to say it was worth every penny I spent and I could not have
assembled the upper out of period correct parts (purchased all separately) for less
than I purchased it from TNTE. This of course given that I could not source an M16
parts kit anywhere at the time I started the project.
Correct rifle and upper all sorted I turned to sourcing my lower receiver,
pistol grip, buttstock, and lower parts. I do not recall exactly where I sourced my
furniture. The only furniture I was missing was the buttstock and pistol grip. The
upper I got from TNTE included the correct triangular handguards. The buttstock
and pistol grip of the early rifles differ from our A2 and later style GI furniture in
both construction and appearance. The older style components are fiberglass (if
I’m not mistaken) and the pistol grip has a lanyard loop and is missing the finger
groove. The buttstock differs in length, that is they are 5/8 inch shorter, and the
sling swivel is retained by a roll pin instead of by the buttstock screw. Some early
stocks did not have compartments for the cleaning kits. The particular stock I was
sent does not have a compartment. There was no option for ordering one with or
without. I think TECHNICALLY the M16A1 had the compartment, but sometimes
beggars can’t be choosers.
For the lower receiver, there are actually a few differences between the
early receivers and the current A2 style lower receivers. According to my research
there were actually three different styles of lower receiver on the early M16s.
Most of the differences in the lower receivers of the early rifles and carbines
pertain to the magazine fence. They had either no magazine fence, a partial
fence, or the full fence we know today. The dead giveaway however is the
difference in reinforcement profile near the take down pins. The early style lack
the extra reinforcement and thus have a slightly different less beefy if you will
profile. Nodak Spud offers all three of the early style lowers. I went with the A1
style lower with full magazine fence. I settled on this after studying my dad’s old
photos and the information available to me through retro black rifle’s website.
They cover the differences in the receivers as well as techniques to modify A2
style lowers into whichever early configuration you desire.
With all my major components sorted I ordered a standard A2 lower
parts kit with buffer assembly and put my rifle together. I know I know all the
hard stuff was done and it really was more of an assembly project than an actual
build. I had no issue getting everything together except I always seem to struggle
getting those darn take down pin detents in without sending them all over the
room. I had to do a little fitting on the buttstock. The A1 stocks are foam filled and
this foam was causing a fit issue on the buffer tube. I simply inletted things until
the stock slid over the tube properly. I left the buffer extension cap off and got a
half inch long ¼-28 screw to substitute for the longer A2 buttstock screw because
the A1 stock is 5/8 inch shorter. At this point I did a standard function test and
then modified the trigger to my liking. I would say to anyone unfamiliar to this
who would like to try building up their own retro AR snag you the AGI AR15 DVD
103. I got it just because I was interested in Bob’s lecture on design and function.
He will walk you through everything you need to know about total disassembly
and reassembly. And if you want to know how to safely modify your trigger
there’s a DVD for that too. It is DVD 335. I acquired both recently out of sheer
curiosity as always Bob never ceases to come through with all the tips and lessons
it takes to do the job correctly and safely.
I wish I had a stellar range report complete with group sizes of different
loads and such, but I have not had a chance to dial in my sights and see what my
M16A1 replica will do. I did however have a chance to test fire it. I had to make a
trip to my camp to do a few chores and finished my chores with enough time to
sling a few rounds. I popped in one of those dreaded thirty round magazines and
let fly. The rifle ran flawlessly and the bolt locked open on the last round. I look
forward to getting this rifle dialed in and seeing what it likes to shoot. I am quite
curious as to where its 1:12 barrel will find its bullet weight limit. I am thinking 55
grains will probably be as heavy as she will go. Barrels can sometimes defy the
rules however. My 69grain match load for my 1:9 twist competition AR will
probably be all over the place in this rifle, but the mad scientist in me cannot help
but try it!
This was a fun and rewarding project and I am beyond pleased with the
upper provided me by TNTE sales. They have an influx of retro parts right now.
The parts seem to come in waves, so you have to kind of strike while the iron is
hot. They still offer the upper I bought along with simply the barrel this upper
wears. They also offer a barrel kit that contains the correct barrel for the old Colt
XM177 carbine. This is a new offering it was not available at the time I was piecing
my M16A1 replica together. Not only do they have the barrel kit and handguards
but they have correct replica collapsible stocks for the XM177. The XM177 is sort
of the M4 carbine’s grandad. It was used by Special Forces and air assault troops
in Vietnam. I have a few photos of my dad with one. I am agonizing over whether
to try and piece one together or just take Gene Kelly’s advice and enjoy the guns I
have. Too many guns so little time and money.
This was more than just a fun project to me. It was a fun project and I now
have a representation of an iconic piece of military history. For me however it is
bigger than even that. I hope that it is a fitting tribute to the men who carried one
and served in defense of this great nation. Whether you carried one in the killing
fields of Vietnam, surviving and coming home to people who may have been less
than appreciative or carried one in the countless smaller skirmishes that occurred
between the end of Vietnam and the adoption of the M16A2. Maybe it was
simply the rifle you trained on for the fight that never came. Whatever your story
this rifle is a tribute to your sacrifice. May she be a quiet reminder of the true
heroes that carried her; the men who never returned home. I deeply appreciate
the service of all of our veterans. I do not mean to simply mention those of a
specific era, but I feel most of our Vietnam veterans have been less than
appreciated especially when they returned home. I think this is quite sad and
shameful. My dad went through basic training sometime in 1977. He served with
men who had served in Vietnam and though he himself did not serve in Vietnam
he held those that did in high esteem and they were some of his closest friends. In
the absence of my father allow me to say thank you. You men of this era served
valiantly whether in conflict or in training for a conflict you carried the mantle of
this great nation and fulfilled your oath. If no one else has ever thanked you I do.